Out of panic, beware the consequences


Each day a man makes choices in the way he’ll live how he will relates to others. Today we try to legislate what we think a man should do. Once upon a time we taught our children a simple set of rules; we talked of them and we read them; we reminded them of them every day. But in our nation a voice cried out its unfair its not right that I should have to partake of this.

So the courts decreed that these rules were out; no longer could they be taught, nor read or seen. But try as I may with all my might I can not find a law writen and passed by the house and the Senate which says that was to be done, For what I read and what I hear is this was the last thing that the founders intended. For Jefferson assured the Bapitist Chruch of Danbury a wall existed to protect and keep this so. For they based our laws on the simple ways of respect all men, respect of spouse, that theft and lying and murder were wrong, even a day of rest, the right to worship as one wished were all included as our rights, but now the courts declared it wrong and said its the worst thing one can teach.

For these past fifty two years this has been the law and the ruination of the land. No longer does the Senate write laws that the courts then enforce but courts declare and tell and make law they desire. Taking power over and above what was once intended.

We now stand in envy of those days long past when people held others in high regard and honor and respect were at our core. We tossed away the rules the guides and said go and do your own thing, forgetting man needs guides and limits but we did not want to hinder him. So we live now with the consequences of those days long past when the courts decree thou shall not murder wrong to teach or read or talk about; not yet ready to admit we made a big mistake. We cry out for laws to stop the maddness when they sit covered in dust upon our shelves. Thinking we can fix and make up better ways ourselves.

Its all defined so is it fine?


The following is a list of terms which many use to define who they think they are and yet the acts and the action speak volumes about who they are not.

 

 

 

 

Conservative

Reluctant to accept change: in favor of preserving the status quo and traditional values and customs, and against abrupt change,

Cautious and on the low side: cautiously moderate

Abrupt sudden: sudden and unexpected

Reluctance lack of enthusiasm: unwillingness or lack of enthusiasm

Lack equals: shortage: a complete absence of a particular thing

                          Something absent: something that is needed but is in short supply or missing

 

 

Right-wing of the republican political party

Right-of-center supports low personal taxation, home ownership, and free-market principles.

 

 

 

Moderate

 Middle-of-the-road: not extreme or radical

Somebody with moderate views: those who hold views that are not extreme, especially political views

 

 

 

Regulate

Control something by rules or laws: to organize and control an activity or process by making it subject to rules or laws (formal)

Control something: to control something and bring it to the desired level, e.g. by adjusting the output of a machine or by imposing restrictions on the flow of something

· Governments of socialist countries regulate their nations’ economies.

 

Controls manage: to exercise power or authority over something such as a business or nation

· The Company is controlled largely by foreign interests.

Restrain or limit something: to limit or restrict somebody or something, e.g. in expression, occurrence, or rate of increase

 

I have found the following to be quite untrue but if you point this out to a liberal they will in simple speak tear your head off. For when challenged they go for the hate rage and threat rather than truth and simple debate on the issue.  

liberal 

Broad-minded: tolerant of different views and standards of behavior in others

 

Progressive politically or socially: favoring gradual reform, especially political reforms that extend democracy, distribute wealth more evenly, and protect the personal freedom of the individual

 

Generous: freely giving money, time, or some other asset

 

(freely giving the money of others taken in higher taxes)

 

Liberal person: somebody who favors tolerance or open-mindedness

 Isn’t it an oddity that the Liberal will freely take and will freely give everyone’s but their own, Cases in point Kennedy Rockefeller Newt and Pelosi. Each of these is worth many millions yet instead of being true example of Liberalism and progress ideals they force us by rule of law to be. Which leads us to this and it seems the truth of what they really do  desire:

 

Communism classless political system: the political theory or system in which all property and wealth is owned in a classless society by all the members of that society, however the following terms can be applied to this utopian state: for it has many social classes and one is defined by which of these they are born into so saying the following is but a ploy to gain acceptance from the unschooled and ignorant.

 

Lacking social classes: not having social or economic classes

Not having social class: not belonging to or associated with a particular social or economic class

Social relating to society: relating to human society and how it is organized

Of rank in society: relating to or considered appropriate to a rank in society, especially the upper classes

Relating to interaction of people: relating to the way in which people in groups behave and interact

 

 

Tolerant means to be:

Accepting different views: accepting the differing views of other people, e.g. in religious or political matters, and treating the people who hold these different views fairly

Withstanding harsh treatment: able to put up with harsh conditions or treatment

 

Tolerate means to: permit something: to be willing to allow something to happen or exist

To tolerate something is to: Accept the existence of different views: to recognize other people’s right to have different beliefs or practices without attempting to suppress them. Yet look at the plight of the Christian in our society today.

 First draft much more to come,

 

whose on first, who is second, why I do not know


Isn’t it just like a liberal, the elite of the left and those who say always yes ,to their rhetoric.  To these people it is justifiable to spew insults like trash at the children of the right; for they feel these children and their parents are ignorant, yes, they are beneath the liberating liberals contempt ,for its only Liberals and their children who matter, only liberals and their  children  who have brains or feelings.. It’s because liberals are so smart and so may have letters behind their names, that they think like this, it’s why so many others look on them in awe and feel that they are truly gods. Yes, they feel and they agree that letters and titles make one wise and all-knowing.

So I wonder what the BS really stands for or even the PhD really means ;well perhaps its Bull shucks or Pig Headed Dummy. Then we must conceder what MD might mean for a liberal perhaps it means Master Dimwit perhaps? Or Mentally Deficient or deprived. These liberals seem to be the epitome of the biblical saying  for they take pleasure in pointing out everyone’s faults, deciding on ways to fix everyone and everything ,then they do all they can to force their ideas on everyone “do not worry about the stick in the other mans eye, worry about the log in yours.” But slingers of bull those pig head fools and dimwits can not see beyond their own noses except when it comes to people who hold to views of morality, right and wrong, the right to life, smaller government and yes , even the right for stupid to exist. However these are people they see and hate….